SolutionsSecurity
Security. An AI-driven security-research lab.
Finds and proves vulnerabilities across nine domains. Every active step stops at a human authorization gate, and every finding ships with a proof a reviewer can re-run. Calibrated to your scope, operated with your team.
Runs as a service today.
The dispatch, the sandbox, and the enforcement are all open source. We tune them to your scope and run the lab with your researchers.
01How it works
From target to proven finding.
A run starts with a target and a domain, and ends with findings and proofs on a graph.
- Select a target and a domain
- A repository, a running service, a binary, a smart contract, or a cloud account, paired with one of nine vulnerability domains.
- Dispatch a specialized agent
- The console dispatches an agent specialized for the domain, running an enforced process in an isolated pod.
- Run real tooling
- The pod wields real open-source security tools: Semgrep, Nuclei, Ghidra, AFL++, Trivy, Slither, and more.
- Extract a research graph
- Results land in a typed graph of assets, findings, and proofs, enriched with CVE, EPSS, and MITRE ATT&CK intelligence.
02Walkthrough
One research run, journaled end to end.
Recon, enumerate, analyze, a hard stop at the authorization gate before anything active, then prove and report.
recon.completed
The run maps the authorized target: surfaces, endpoints, dependencies. Nothing active yet.
enumerate.completed
Candidate weaknesses enumerated with the domain's tooling and recorded on the research graph.
analyze.completed
Findings analyzed and ranked. One candidate needs an active step to confirm.
breakpoint.holding
The run stops before the active step, states the step and the target, and waits.
breakpoint.approved
A security lead reviews the scope and approves. The approval is itself a record on the run.
prove.completed
The finding is confirmed with a proof, linked to its evidence and its CVE, EPSS, and MITRE ATT&CK tags.
report.filed
Findings, proofs, and the journal that produced them. Every step replays from the record.
03Coverage
Nine vulnerability domains.
Each has its own specialized agent, tooling, and calibration.
- 01Code / SAST
- 02Logic
- 03System / infra
- 04Web
- 05API
- 06Binary RE / fuzzing / exploit
- 07Cloud / container
- 08Supply chain / SCA
- 09Crypto / smart contract
04Safety posture
Authorization is a gate, not a footnote.
Offensive actions are scope-gated and approval-gated. Before any active step, the run stops, states what it intends to do and against which target, and waits for a human.
The process enforces the gate. A run cannot skip it, because the code does not permit it to.
05Who it is for
Five personas, one lab.
- 01Vulnerability researcher
- Drives targeted research from process to proven finding.
- 02Red-teamer
- Chains findings into scoped, approval-gated offensive steps.
- 03Threat hunter
- Works the graph outward from an asset to what else is exposed.
- 04Blue / detection engineer
- Turns proven findings into detections, evidence trail included.
- 05Security lead
- Sets scope and holds the authorization gate before anything active.
06Calibration
Trained against per-domain evals.
- Per-domain evals
- Each domain has its own eval set: known-vulnerable targets, expected findings, and the process a run should follow.
- Scored on process and result
- A run is scored on following the recon-to-report process and on what it found. Obedience and capability are scored apart.
- Tuned until the target holds
- Process, tool skills, and memory are tuned until runs hit each domain's target score and hold it when the evals re-run.
A research lab that cannot act without authorization, and does not report without proof.
An unproven finding is an opinion with a severity score. What leaves this lab replays.
Point it at a target you authorize, and watch the gate hold.
A demo is a live research run against a target you authorize, gate in view.
Or emailhello@a5c.ai
The intro call is 30 minutes and free.